Analisis Perbandingan Metode VLAN dan MAC-based dalam Penerapan Segmentasi Jaringan pada Jaringan OpenFlow

Analisis Perbandingan Metode VLAN dan MAC-based dalam Penerapan Segmentasi Jaringan pada Jaringan OpenFlow

Penulis

  • Reza Ainurrachman Universitas Brawijaya
  • Widhi Yahya Universitas Brawijaya

Kata Kunci:

Software Defined Network (SDN), segmentasi jaringan, Data Center Network (DCN)

Abstrak

Dengan adanya perkembangan teknologi serta peningkatan terhadap kebutuhan layanan yang berjalan secara daring, performa jaringan menjadi salah satu perhatian karena dapat mempengaruhi kinerja dari layanan tersebut. Salah satu komponen yang bertanggung jawab atas performa dari layanan tersebut adalah Data Center Network (DCN). DCN merupakan komponen penyusun distribusi layanan yang dapat terdiri dari switch, storage, load balancing yang berjalan mendukung proses layanan secara daring. Untuk meningkatkan performa DCN, dapat dilakukan penerapan segmentasi jaringan yang akan membagi jaringan secara virtual menjadi beberapa tenant yang saling terisolasi satu sama lain sehingga dapat digunakan untuk memprioritaskan layanan tertentu. Pada penelitian ini dilakukan penerapan segmentasi jaringan menggunakan 2 metode, yaitu metode VLAN (berdasarkan port) dan metode MAC-based (berdasarkan MAC address). Penggunaan kedua metode tersebut terinspirasi oleh penerapan segmentasi jaringan menggunakan konsep Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) yang akan diterapkan pada paradigma jaringan Software Defined Network (SDN). Pengujian pada penelitian ini dilakukan menjadi 2 tahap, yaitu pengujian fungsional untuk melakukan pengecekan keberhasilan isolasi antar tenant dengan mengirim paket ping, TCP, UDP, broadcast, dan pengujian performa untuk melihat performa jaringan dengan mengukur nilai Round Trip Time (RTT) dan nilai throughput yang dilakukan dengan 3 variasi. Hasilnya pada pengujian fungsional, semua metode berhasil mengisolasi tenant, tetapi saat pengujian dengan paket broadcast, metode MAC-based masih bisa meloloskan paket yang tidak sesuai perancangan sistem. Sedangkan pada pengujian performa, metode MAC-based lebih unggul pada semua pengujian kecuali pengujian throughput yang ketiga karena pengaruh lolosnya paket broadcast yang tidak sesuai perancangan sistem.

Referensi

Afolabi, I., Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Ksentini, A., & Flinck, H. (2018). Network slicing and softwarization: A survey on principles, enabling technologies, and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 20(3), 2429–2453. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2815638

Alam, T. (2020). Cloud Computing and Its Role in the Information Technology. SSRN Electronic Journal, May. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3639063

Asadollahi, S., Goswami, B., & Sameer, M. (2018). Ryu controller’s scalability experiment on software defined networks. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Current Trends in Advanced Computing, ICCTAC 2018, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCTAC.2018.8370397

Askar, S. (2017). SDN-Based Load Balancing Scheme for Fat-Tree Data Center Networks. Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences, 20(5), 1047–1056. https://nahje.com/index.php/main/article/download/335/270%0Ahttps://nahje.com/index.php/main/article/view/335%0Ahttps://lens.org/055-872-205-669-722

Casado, M., Freedman, M. J., Pettit, J., Luo, J., McKeown, N., & Shenker, S. (2007). Ethane: Taking control of the enterprise. Computer Communication Review, 37(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1282427.1282382

Chen, C. H., Lu, S. H., Tseng, C. C., & Chen, C. (2016). Role-based campus network slicing. Proceedings - International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP, 2016-Decem(CoolSDN), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNP.2016.7785315

De Oliveira, R. L. S., Schweitzer, C. M., Shinoda, A. A., & Prete, L. R. (2014). Using Mininet for emulation and prototyping Software-Defined Networks. 2014 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing, COLCOM 2014 - Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ColComCon.2014.6860404

Gentile, A. F., Fazio, P., & Miceli, G. (2021). A Survey on the Implementation and Management of Secure Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and Virtual LANs (VLANs) in Static and Mobile Scenarios. Telecom, 2(4), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom2040025

Guo, C., Yuan, L., Xiang, D., Dang, Y., Huang, R., Maltz, D., Liu, Z., Wang, V., Pang, B., Chen, H., Lin, Z. W., & Kurien, V. (2015). Pingmesh: A Large-Scale System for Data Center Network Latency Measurement and Analysis. Computer Communication Review, 45(4), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785956.2787496

Jimson, E. R., Nisar, K., & Hijazi, M. H. A. (2018). The State of the Art of Software Defined Networking (SDN). International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 10(4), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicthd.2018100104

Jo, E., Pan, D., Liu, J., & Butler, L. (2015). A simulation and emulation study of SDN-based multipath routing for fat-tree data center networks. Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference, 2015-Janua, 3072–3083. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2014.7020145

Keti, F., & Askar, S. (2015). Emulation of Software Defined Networks Using Mininet in Different Simulation Environments. Proceedings - International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation, ISMS, 2015-Octob, 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMS.2015.46

Kurniawan, M. T., Fathinuddin, M., Widiyanti, H. A., & Simanjuntak, G. R. (2021). Network Slicing on SDN using FlowVisor and POX Controller to Traffic Isolation Enforcement. 7th International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies, ICEET 2021, October, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEET53442.2021.9659765

Muttaqin, A. R., Yahya, W., & Siregar, R. A. (2018). Implementasi Network Slicing dengan menggunakan Flowvisor untuk Mengontrol Traffic Data Packet pada Jaringan Software Defined Network. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(2), 793–801. https://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/960

Nguyen, V. G., & Kim, Y. H. (2016). SDN-based enterprise and campus networks: A case of VLAN management. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 12(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.03.0039

Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X. N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014). A survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future of programmable networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(3), 1617–1634. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2014.012214.00180

Rehman, A., Siddiqui, F. A., Khan, J. R., & Saeed, M. (2019). Spanning tree protocol for preventing loops and saving energy in software defined networks along with its vulnerability and threat analyses. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 857, 1166–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01177-2_84

Taherimonfared, A., & Rong, C. (2013). Multi-tenant Network Monitoring. Multi-Tenant Network Monitoring Based on Software Defined Networking, 327–341.

Wang, T., Su, Z., Xia, Y., and Hamdi, M. (2014). Rethinking the Data Center Networking: Architecture, Network Protocols, and Resource Sharing. In IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 1481-1496. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2383439.

Wulandari, R. (2016). Analisis QoS (Quality of Service) Pada Jaringan Internet. Jurnal Teknik Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi, 2(2), 162–172.

Xia, W., Zhao, P., Wen, Y., & Xie, H. (2017). A Survey on Data Center Networking (DCN): Infrastructure and Operations. In IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials (Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 640–656). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2626784

Yu, M., Rexford, J., Sun, X., Rao, S., & Feamster, N. (2011). A survey of virtual LAN usage in campus networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(7), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.5936161

Zhao, A., Liu, Z., Pan, J., & Liang, M. (2017). A simple, cost-effective addressing and routing architecture for fat-tree based datacenter networks. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, INFOCOM WKSHPS 2017, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2017.8116349

Kubo, R., Fujita, T., & Agawa, Y. (2014). Ryu SDN Framework : Open Source SDN Infrastructure Software (Special feature: Current Status of Technology Development for Network Virtualization). In NTT Technology Journal (Vol. 26, Issue 5). RYU project team. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40020078728/

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

21 Jun 2024

Cara Mengutip

Ainurrachman, R., & Yahya, W. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Metode VLAN dan MAC-based dalam Penerapan Segmentasi Jaringan pada Jaringan OpenFlow. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 8(5). Diambil dari https://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/13740

Terbitan

Bagian

Artikel
Loading...